← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32901/2025allowed

Tetari Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-20Mr. Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32901 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-16 Year-2025 Thana- PARSAUNI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Tetari Devi W/O Mahang Sah, Resident of Village- Parshurampur, Tin Toli, Ward No.7, P S.- Parsauni, Dist- Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 20-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in connection with Parsauni P.S. Case No.16 of 2025 instituted under Sections 103, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, the co-accused persons including the petitioner killed the son of informant by slitting his neck and due to absence of entire family members, kept the dead body in his house.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that only on the basis of suspicion, the petitioner has been made accused in this case. He also submits that the dead body of the deceased has been recovered from the house of the informant and the deceased has committed suicide and the police filed charge sheet against the other co-accused

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32901 of 2025(2) dt.20-05-2025 2/2 persons under Sections 108/3(5) of B.N.S. Learned counsel further submits that the date of occurrence is 03.02.2025 and on 04.02.2025 the inquest report was prepared in which two family members were the witnesses but no suspicion was raised. Later on with ulterior motive, the present F.I.R. has been lodged against the accused persons including the petitioner. The petitioner is a lady having no criminal antecedent and she undertakes to cooperate in the investigation.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. 1 st Class, Sitamarhi in connection with Parsauni P.S. Case No.16 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Ritik/- U T