Rudal Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44516 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2021 Thana- MUNGER MUFFASIL District- Munger ====================================================== 1.

Rudal Mahto, Son of Rajniti Yadav 2.

Yugal Mahto, Son of Rajniti Yadav 3.

Lagina Mahto, Son of Hare Ram Mahto 4.

Rajkishore Mahto @ Raj Kumar Mahto, Son Of Mahendra Mahto 5.

Shankar Mahto, Son of Mahendra Mahto 6.

Dilip Mahto, Son of Mahendra Mahto 7.

Bipin Mahto, Son of Hare Ram Mahto 8.

Kishore Mahto, Son of Late Dev Mahto 9.

Hare Ram Mahto, Son of Late Medani Mahto All Resident Of Village - Dhautal Mahto Tola, Tikarampur, P.S.- Mufasil, Distt.- Munger.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Indu Bhushan, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Abhay Kumar Roy, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 23-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned APP for the state.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No.30 of 2021 registered for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 448, 323, 325, 354(B), 354(C), 506, 504 of the IPC and 8 of the POCSO Act.

It is a case of assault and outraging of modesty of the informant's daughter by the petitioners.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submit that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44516 of 2021(2) dt.23-03-2022 2/2 in the present case. He further submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and informant and petitioners are agnates. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submit that both the parties are agnates, compromise has been done between them without any pressure, and in support of that Annexure-3 has been annexed to this petition. Petitioners have clean antecedent. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, is directed to be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.D.J.,VIth-cum-Exclusive Special Judge (POCSO Act), Munger in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No.30 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Prakash Narayan /- U T