← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./34862/2022disposed

Rakesh Kumar Mishra @ Rakesh Mishra v. The State Of Bihar

2022-09-13Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34862 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-291 Year-2021 Thana- RAJIVNAGAR District- Patna ====================================================== RAKESH KUMAR MISHRA @ RAKESH MISHRA S/o Ram Badan Mishra Resident of Mohalla - Raja bazar, Sheikhpura Bagicha, Bazar Gali House No. 232, P.S.- Shastri Nagar, District - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kalyan Shankar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 13-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Let the defect(s), if any, as pointed out by the office be removed within four weeks.

The petitioner is in judicial custody in connection with Rajeev Nagar P.S. Case No. 291 of 2021 for the offences under Sections 414, 401, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the FIR, the informant has alleged that the petitioner is in habit of cutting, modifying and selling the stolen vehicle in his garage. It is further alleged that informant has received information that a stolen scorpio bearing registration no. WB 12 AV 9574 was stolen and vehicle was modified by changing the number plate and bumper in the Vaishnavi garage, Patna which belongs to the petitioner. On raid and search, 11 four Wheelers and two motorcycles as well as many number plates cut into different pieces

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34862 of 2022(2) dt.13-09-2022 2/3 were recovered from the said garage. Accordingly, the FIR was lodged and the petitioner was taken into custody. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is owner of the Vaishnavi Garage where the vehicles come and get repaired and taken away. Before repaired, the number plates are removed from the car/vehicle and as per the prosecution story, the matter was investigated in connection with Goraul P.S. Case No. 218 of 2020 whereas the said FIR (Annexure-2 of the bail application) does not show any allegation of stolen vehicle. It is his submission that he do not have any criminal antecedent and is in jail since 28.03.2022 (as stated in paragraph -17 of the bail application). Per contra, learned APP for the State submits that there is so much of recovery/seizure of the different parts of the vehicle from the said garage and as such, the role of the petitioner cannot be ignored.

Be that as it may, in the present case, the petitioner is the owner of the Vaishnavi garage where scraps were present as narrated above by counsel for the petitioner he is in custody since 28.03.2022 and has no criminal antecedent and ultimately, he has to face the trial, this court is inclined to grant him privilege of bail after framing of charge.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34862 of 2022(2) dt.13-09-2022 3/3 Magistrate -III, Patna in connection with Rajeev Nagar P.S. Case No. 291 of 2021, subject to the following conditions:- (i) one of the bailor should be the family member of the petitioner, who shall provide official document to show his/her bona fide;

(ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reasons will entail his cancellation of bail by the Trial Court itself;

(iii) he shall appear before the concerned police station every month till the conclusion of the trial to mark his presence;

(iv) the petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. With the aforesaid observations, the bail application is allowed.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Jagdish/NehaU T