Ram Suresh Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.23867 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -4 Year- 2015 Thana -RAGHOPUR DistrictVAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ====================================================== Ram Suresh Singh Son of Late Khijan Singh Resident of village - Fatehpur, P.S. Raghopur, District - Vaishali .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajive Ranjan Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt.Reena Sinha(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 14-07-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional P.P. as well as learned counsel for the informant.
The petitioner seeks bail in Raghopur P.S. Case No. 4 of 2015, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.
It is alleged that the informant along with his brother and sons, namely Manoj Kumar Singh, Ajit Kumar Singh had gone to the Darwaja of Kamakhaya Singh and while they were returning Rana Ranvijay Singh @ Babloo Singh, Vishwavijay Singh, Pankaj Singh, Ram Suresh Singh (the petitioner), Chandrama Singh, Dhiraj Singh and some unknown persons surrounded them. Rana Ranvijay Singh fired, which hit on the neck of the son of the informant. Vishwavijay Singh fired, which hit on the abdomen of the son of the informant, Pankaj Singh fired which hit on the abdomen of Manoj Singh, the son of the informant. Ram Suresh Singh fired which hit on the leg
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23867 of 2015 (2) dt.14-07-2015 2/2 of the son of the informant. Chandrama Singh fired which did not hit the son of the informant. Thereafter Dhiraj Singh fired which hit on the thigh. His son died on his way to hospital.
It is submitted that post-mortem was done on the dead body of the deceased but no injury was found on the leg of the deceased. Learned counsel for the informant however opposed the prayer for bail but could not be able to show that the deceased got injury on the leg. From the post-mortem report it appears that there was no wound of firearm on the leg of Manoj Kumar Singh. Chandrama Singh has already been enlarged on bail.
Considering the facts aforesaid and the fact that the petitioner is alleged to have fired which hit on the leg, but no wound of firearm is found, the petitioner above named is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hajipur at Vaishali, in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No. 4/2015. (Prabhat Kumar Jha, J.) Rakhi/- U T