Harendra Chaudhary @ Harendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33689 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2025 Thana- UCHKAGAON District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1.

Harendra Chaudhary @ Harendra Yadav S/o Rangalal Chaudhary R/o VillBarari Jagdish , P.S.- Uchakagaon, Dist- Gopalganj 2.

Ramakant Yadav @ Lalu Yadav S/o Harendra Prasad Yadav R/o Vill- Barari Jagdish , P.S.- Uchakagaon, Dist- Gopalganj 3.

Jitendra Choudhary @ Jitendra Kumar S/o Bairishtar Prasad Yadav R/o VillBarari Jagdish , P.S.- Uchakagaon, Dist- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kumar Harshvardhan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Umeshanand Pandit Mr. Akash Raj ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 14-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 329(3), 126(2), 115(2), 109 and 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. The allegation in the first information report is that the petitioners assaulted the informant by means of lathi, rod and bricks causing injury to him.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the occurrence has taken place on account of a land dispute between the parties and there is a case and counter case, which has been brought on record by way of Annexure-P/2 to this petition. Further, the injury report also indicates that the injuries received

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33689 of 2025(6) dt.14-08-2025 2/2 by the informant are simple in nature. The petitioners do not have any criminal antecedent and undertake to cooperate in the investigation and trial.

5. Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 have opposed the grant of anticipatory bail. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the informant that they have serious suspicion that the injury report is forged one regarding which a complaint has been made by the informant.

6. Considering all the above mentioned facts and circumstances as well as the fact that injuries are simple in nature and clean antecedent, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Uchakagaon P.S. Case No. 05 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S. (Soni Shrivastava, J) Trivedi/- U T