Patna High CourtCR. MISC./35886/2025bail rejected

Rajnikant @ Rajnikant Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

2025-10-31Mr. Justice Khatim Reza2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35886 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-124 Year-2013 Thana- SIWAIPATTI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Rajnikant @ Rajnikant Sahni S/o Late Chetu Sahni R/o Vill- Raghai, P.S.- Siwaipatti, Dist- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER 31-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 841 of 2022 arising out of Siwaipatti PS Case No. 124 of 2013 dated 17.11.2013, instituted under Sections 302 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail was rejected thrice by this Court. This is the fourth attempt.

4. Vide order dated 26.09.2025, status of Sessions Trial No. 841 of 2022 was called for from the Trial Court with regard to present stage of trial. The Trial Court has submitted its report dated 08.10.2025 stating therein that the case is at the stage of final arguments.

5. Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35886 of 2025(9) dt.31-10-2025 2/2 submits that there is no fresh ground to consider the prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail.

6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage since the case is at the stage of final arguments in the Trial Court.

7. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is once again rejected.

8. The trial Court is directed to take all efforts to conclude the trial positively within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

9. The application stands dismissed.

(Khatim Reza, J) prabhat/- U T