Surya Narayan Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36532 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-184 Year-2014 Thana- LAUKAHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.
Surya Narayan Sah S/O Late Firangi Sah R/O Village- Parsa, Dhankhour, Ratantola, P.S.- Ghoghardiha, District- Madhubani 2.
Raj Narayan Sah S/O Late Farebi Sah R/O Village- Parsa, Dhankhour, Ratantola, P.S.- Ghoghardiha, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Ram Autar Sah S/O Late Mahanthi Sah R/O Vill.- Jhahuri, P.S.- Laukahi, Dist.- Madhubani.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ravi Prakash, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Pronoti Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 10-09-2025 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Laukahi P.S. Case No. 184 of 2014 for the offence under Sections 420, 467, 468, 469, 471, 379, 323, 504 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, lodged on 12.12.2014 by the informant, Ram Autar Sah.
3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that a piece of land belongs to them but the accused persons armed variously claiming it to be their own got the crop removed and upon objecting to it, they were abused/assaulted. The allegation in the F.I.R. is that they have resorted to fake documents to assert their claim on the land. This led to the F.I.R.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36532 of 2025(3) dt.10-09-2025 2/3
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that earlier the Police had submitted final form but in the year 2018, cognizance was taken since the summons came only in the year 2024, the present anticipatory bail.
5. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner executed the sale deed and as such, has come in the present case as an accused. In continuation, it has been submitted that other coaccused have been granted relief in Cr. Misc. No. 20929 of 2025 (Ram Autar Sah & Ors. vs. State) (Annexure-6 to the petition).
6. Learned counsel for the informant has appeared and according to him, they have entered compromise, in that background, this Court is inclined to grant them the anticipatory bail with conditions.
7. Let the petitioners in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order, shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. 1st Class, Jhanjharpur District, Madhubani in connection with Laukahi P.S. Case No. 184 of 2014 subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(i) one of the bailor should be the family members/relatives of the petitioners, who shall provide official
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36532 of 2025(3) dt.10-09-2025 3/3 document to show his bona fide;
(ii) the petitioners shall appear on each and every date before the Trial court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail bond by the Trial court itself;
(iii) the petitioners shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;
(iv) the petitioners shall desist from committing any criminal offence again failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds. (Rajiv Roy, J) Vijay Singh/- U T