Golu @ Patula @ Datula v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.22345 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -234 Year- 2015 Thana -PATNA CITY CHOWK District- PATNA ====================================================== Golu @ Patula @ Datula Son of Sri Kailash Prasad Resident of Mohalla - Ranipur Rasulpur, P.S. Mehndiganj, District - Patna. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bijendra Prasad Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Pd. Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-06-2016 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioner is languishing in custody since 11.10.2015 in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 399, 402, 120B of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act and sections 18, 22, 24, 25 of the N.D.P.S.Act. The informant received an information that some miscreants are making plan to commit crime. On the said information the informant alongwith police party reached at the spot. Seeing the police party some persons started fleeing away but they were caught. From the possession of the petitioner one mobile and 30 Pudia Ganja were recovered.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the weight of the seized Ganja has not been mentioned in the seizure list.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22345 of 2016 (3) dt.20-06-2016 This fact has not been controverted by the learned counsel for the State. The investigation has already concluded. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, abovenamed, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. District and Sessions Judge II, Patna in Chowk P.S.Case No. 234/2015.
The learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner in two eventualities, i.e. if he defaults for two consecutive occasions or substantially gets involved in similar nature of offence.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Surendra/- U