Nutan Mala v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8670 of 2020 ====================================================== Nutan Mala, aged about 44 years, Wife of Manoj Kumar Singh, Reside at T.N. Singh Road, Near N.C.C. South Court Compound, P.S.- Adampur, District- Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Education Department, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Education Department, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director, Primary Education Department, Bihar Patna. 4.

The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Bhagalpur, District- Bhagalpur. 5.

The District Education Officer, Bhagalpur, District- Bhagalpur. 6.

The District Programme Officer (Estab.), Bhagalpur, District- Bhagalpur. 7.

The Block Education Officer, Goradih, Bhagalpur, District- Bhagalpur. 8.

The Mukhia, Gram Panchayat, Tarchha, Damuchak, P.S.- Goradih, DistrictBhagalpur. 9.

The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Tarchha, Damuchak, P.S.- Goradih, District- Bhagalpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Madhav Prasad Yadav, G.P.-23 For respondent No.8 :

Dr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 04-02-2021 Heard Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Madhav Prasad Yadav, learned Govt. Pleader No.-23, appearing for the State and Dr. Manoj Kumar, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.8.

Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of this writ application, the order of suspension has been revoked vide

Patna High Court CWJC No.8670 of 2020(3) dt.04-02-2021 2/2 Memo No.10 dated 26.11.2020 and as such the present writ application has now become infructuous and seeks permission to withdraw this writ application. Permission is granted. In view of the aforesaid, this writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.

However, the petitioner is permitted to file representation before the respondents-authorities claiming subsistence allowance which according to learned counsel for the petitioner has not been paid as yet.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) sanjeev/- U