Mukesh Yadav @ Mukesh Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40873 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2024 Thana- PANDARAK District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Mukesh Yadav @ Mukesh Rai Son of Shiv Balak Rai Resident of Village - Sarhan, P.S.- Pandarak, District- Patna.

2.

Mithalesh yadav Son of Shiv Balak Rai Resident of Village - Sarhan, P.S.- Pandarak, District- Patna.

3.

Lallu Yadav Son of Shiv Balak Rai Resident of Village - Sarhan, P.S.- Pandarak, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Kashyap, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Brajendra Nath Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-08-2024 Heard learned counsels for the parties.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 325, 307, and 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per prosecution case, these petitioners are alleged to have assaulted and fired upon informant.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that though there is allegation of firing against these petitioner but doctor has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40873 of 2024(3) dt.14-08-2024 2/2 found the injuries on person of informant to be simple in nature, caused by hard and blunt substance.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners and submitted that petitioners are named in the F.I.R. with specific allegation of firing and assault.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and nature of injuries sustained by the injured, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., 1st, Barh, Patna, in connection with Pandarak P.S. Case No. 72 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T