Jai Prakash Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32917 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-386 Year-2019 Thana- KATEYA District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Jai Prakash Tiwari Son of Late Indradeo Tiwari Resident of Village - Baikunthpur, P.S.- Kateya, Distt.- Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Satyendra Rai, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 22-06-2021 Heard the parties in virtual Court proceeding. The petitioner is languishing in custody for the offences punishable under Sections 420/467/468/406/409 of the Indian Penal Code.
Petitioner is in custody since 10.06.2020.
Allegation is that petitioner was Manager at Customer Service Centre at the State Bank of India branch. From the bank account of the complainant rupees one lac was transferred for fixed deposit for eight years. However, money was not deposited in the fixed deposit scheme and it was allegedly defalcated by the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and the regulation of the Bank does not permit withdrawal of more than Rs. 10,000/-
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32917 of 2020(6) dt.22-06-2021 2/2 at a Customer Service Centre.
Learned counsel for the complainant opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the entire facts aforesaid, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with Kateya P.S. Case No.386 of 2019, with following conditions:
(a) Both the bailors shall be the resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned Court-below.
(b) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.
(c) The petitioner shall not leave the country without permission of the trial Court.
(Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- U T