Sahjanand Prabhaker v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.19006 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1 Year- 2016 Thana -PALI District- JEHANABAD ======================================================
1. Sahjanand Prabhaker S/o Ramanugrah Paswan R/o Village Nadpura, P.S. Parasbigha, District Jehanabad, Ex- Headmaster Govt. Middle School, Bhadsara.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Santosh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. P.N.Pandit(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 05-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 409, 406, 420, 467, 468 of the Indian Penal Code.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that without admitting the prosecution case, petitioner is ready to deposit the amount of Rs. 50,000/- with the concerned department and for the aforesaid deposit, petitioner needs some time.
In view of the aforesaid submission, petitioner is directed to be released on provisional bail for the period of two
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19006 of 2016 (3) dt.05-05-2016 2/2 months on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Judge-III, Jehanabad in connection with Pali P.S. Case No. 01 of 2016, subject to condition that within two months from the date of his release from jail custody he shall deposit the amount in question with concerned department and shall produce the deposit receipt before the concerned court and if petitioner does so, the concerned court shall confirm the provisional bail granted to the petitioner but if he fails to deposit the above stated amount within the above stated period, the concerned court shall take steps to procure the attendance of petitioner in accordance with law and shall not pass order of confirmation of provisional bail granted to the petitioner.
In view of the aforesaid observations/findings, this bail petition stands disposed of.
(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) SHAHZAD/- U T