Rajendra Khaira v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38197 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-111 Year-2022 Thana- SUIYA District- Banka ====================================================== Rajendra Khaira S/O Tarni Khaira Resident of Village-Dharamshila, P.S.- Suiya, District-Banka.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Brij Nandan Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shyameshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 02-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has moved this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 302, 201, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per allegation in the FIR, petitioner in connivance with other family members killed the informant's daughter and concealed her dead body. Informant has firm belief that this petitioner (husband of the deceased) had committed murder of his daughter and then the FIR.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is husband of the deceased and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. No one is the eye witness of the present occurrence. Over a trivial dispute, the informant's

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38197 of 2024(3) dt.02-07-2024 2/2 daughter had committed suicide. Father-in-law of the deceased, namely, Tarni Khaira has already been granted bail vide order dated 17.4.2023 in Cr. Misc. No. 8664 of 2023 by this Court. No metallic, alkaloidal or volatile poison could be detected as per FSL report. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and languishing in judicial custody since 19.7.2022.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge VI-cum-Special Judge, POCSO, Banka in connection with S.T. No. 603 of 2022 arising out of Suiya P.S. Case No. 111 of 2022.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U