Raghunath Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34837 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-59 Year-2022 Thana- RAMGARH District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== 1.

RAGHUNATH SINGH Son of Late Jagdish Singh Resident of Village - Darwan, Police Station - Ramgarh, District - Kaimur (Bhabua). 2.

Raghwendra Singh Son of Late Jagdish singh Resident of Village - Darwan, Police Station - Ramgarh, District - Kaimur (Bhabua). 3.

Vikash Singh son of Raghwendra Singh Resident of Village - Darwan, Police Station - Ramgarh, District - Kaimur (Bhabua). 4.

Satyendra singh Son of Late Rajroop Singh Resident of Village - Darwan, Police Station - Ramgarh, District - Kaimur (Bhabua). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Chandra Mohan Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jagdhar Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 25-08-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month.

At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that during the pendency of this anticipatory bail application, petitioner no.3 has been arrested and, as such, the same has become infructuous. He, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw this application as against petitioner no.3. In view of the aforesaid submission, the application is dismissed as withdrawn as having become infructuous as

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34837 of 2022(2) dt.25-08-2022 2/3 against petitioner no.3.

Petitioner nos. 1, 2 and 4 apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 307, 379, 354(B), 341, 323, 504, 506 and 327/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, registered in connection with Ramgarh P.S.Case No. 59 of 2022.

As per allegation, the petitioners and other accused persons forcibly possessed the land of the informant. On protest, the accused persons fired on the son of the informant and snatched away golden chain.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that no fire-arm injury has been found on the person of the informant and it was bruise and abrasion, found to be simple in nature. He has submitted that there is case and counter case and previous land dispute between the parties.

Considering the above facts and circumstances, let petitioner nos. 1, 2 and 4, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from the date of communication of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-I, Kaimur at Bhabhua in connection with Ramgarh P.S.case No. 59

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34837 of 2022(2) dt.25-08-2022 3/3 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C.

Office shall ensure that all the defects are removed by the petitioners within the stipulated time provided hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) HR/- U T