← Library
Patna High CourtCR. APP (SJ)/1983/2025dismissed

Munna Kumar Yadav @ Munna Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-28Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1983 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-90 Year-2025 Thana- LALGANJ District- Vaishali ====================================================== Munna Kumar Yadav @ Munna Kumar son of Late Lakhindra Prasad Yadav @ Rakesh Kumar Yadav Residents of Village -Sarariya P S- Lalganj District -Vaishali ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1 .

The State of Bihar 2.

Smt. Nilam Wife of Prabhat Samir village- Bara Bariyarpur, Ps- Chhatauni, Dist- Motihari, At Present Block Devlopment officer Lalganj, Ps- Lalganj, Dist- Vaishali ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Shyameshwar Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sadanand Paswan, Spl. PP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. This appeal has been filed for setting aside order dated 17.04.2025 passed in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 126, 352,351 (3) , 324 ( 4 ), 132 and 308 (3) of BNS and sections 3(i)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, (Prevention of Atrocities ) Act, 1989, whereby the prayer for anticipatory bail of the appellant has been rejected.

3 . The prosecution case in brief, is that on 24.02.2025 , while informant, who was Block Development Officer of Lalganj Vaishali, was simply discharging her duty in office , in the meantime , all the accused persons named in the

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1983 of 2025(3) dt.28-07-2025 2/2 F.I.R., including this appellant came to her office and abused her by caste name and demanded Rs. 5,000/- and also extended threat.

4. Considering the fact that all the accused persons including this appellant created obstruction in discharge of her duty and other circumstances of case , and I do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order, accordingly this appeal is dismissed.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T