Md. Tarikh Khan @ Md. Tarik v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34656 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2025 Thana- CHERKI District- Gaya ====================================================== Md. Tarikh Khan @ Md. Tarik S/O Md. Ekhalak Ahamad @ Md. Ekhalak Khan R/o Village- Khap, P.S.- Cherki, Dist.- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Harsh Vardhan For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Arun Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 20-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Cherki P.S. Case No. 13 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 127(1), 115(2), 110, 74, 303(2), 352, 351 (2) and 3 (5) of B.N.S, 2023.
3. As per prosecution case, petitioner and other armed with danda and iron rod came at the house of the informant and abused her. It is further alleged that petitioner is said to have assaulted the informant's daughter by means of danda as a result of which she sustained injury and also made indecent behaviour with her. It is further alleged that petitioner and other started beating informant and her daughter and petitioner snatched silver chain of the informant and also tore
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34656 of 2025(3) dt.20-08-2025 2/3 the clothes of the informant.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged in the FIR and he has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner bears no criminal antecedent. On the basis of earlier dispute regarding passage of drain, petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case. It is further submitted that there is specific allegation against the petitioner to assault the informant's daughter but the injury sustained by the victim is simple in nature.
5. The learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that there is specific allegation against the petitioner and same is supported and corroborated by the injury report.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, keeping in view clean antecedent of petitioner, argument advanced on behalf of both sides and also taking into consideration the material available on record, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34656 of 2025(3) dt.20-08-2025 3/3 amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-V, Gaya in connection with Cherki P.S. Case No. 13 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of B.N.S.S. (Alok Kumar Pandey, J) vashudha/- U T