← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./35807/2026rejected

Golu Gope @ Golu Kumar @ Rajnish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-07-08Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35807 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-33 Year-2026 Thana- HARNAUT District- Nalanda ====================================================== Golu Gope @ Golu Kumar @ Rajnish Kumar son of Santosh Prasad Resident of Village- Aaraut, Ps- Wen Dist- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rana Baljit Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 08-07-2026 Heard Mr. Rana Baljit Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Bharat Bhushan, learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 28.01.2026 in connection with Harnaut P.S. Case No. 33 of 2026, FIR dated 18.01.2026 registered for the offence under Section 309(4) and 317(3) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023.

3. According to the prosecution case, the informant, Rohit Kumar, used to work as a Team Leader of Flip cart, Nalanda. On 17th January 2026 at about 8.50 PM, he was present in his office along with his team mates, a person, who had covered his face, entered in the office and robbed Rs. 2,54,950 at gun point. One miscreant was standing at the gate while another was standing outside the gate. After taking money

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35807 of 2026(3) dt.08-07-2026 2/3 all three persons fled away on a black Pulsar-Motor Cycle. Apart from the cash, they also took various articles such as a dash board, key board, mouse, Scanner, thermal printer etc. Thereafter first information report was lodged against three unknown persons.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner is not named in the FIR and his name transpired during investigation on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused, namely, Raj Babbar Kumar and except the aforesaid, no other cogent material has come during investigation which suggest the involvement of the petitioner in the present occurrence and the petitioner is rotting in judicial custody since 28.01.2026.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State, on the other hand, has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that on the basis of disclosure made by the petitioner, three mobile phones, a red and black pulsar motorcycle and looted money was recovered from the house of the petitioner and apart from that petitioner carries one criminal antecedent other than the present one.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35807 of 2026(3) dt.08-07-2026 3/3 case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with Harnaut P.S. Case No. 33 of 2026, pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-1st, Biharsharif, Nalanda.

7. Prayer is refused.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Suruchi/- U T