← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./20445/2015bail granted

Sushil Kumar Mandal @ Sahil @ Sushil Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

2015-05-20Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.20445 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -22 Year- 2014 Thana -JAGDISHPUR District- BHAGALPUR ====================================================== Sushil Kumar Mandal @ Sahil @ Sushil Mandal Son of Umesh Mandal, Resident of Village- Ganeshpur Tinpuliya, P.S.- Jagdishpur, DistrictBhagalpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Davendra Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Veena Kumari Jaiswal (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 20-05-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking bail in connection with Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 22 of 2014 registered for offence under section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner had earlier moved before this Court for bail in Cr. Misc. No. 45919 of 2014 and this Court, vide order dated 4th February 2015, rejected the same but liberty was given to renew his prayer for bail after completion of one year in jail custody.

The counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 23rd March 2014. Looking to the period of custody of the petitioner, let

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20445 of 2015 (2) dt.20-05-2015 2/2 the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur in connection with Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 22 of 2014, subject to the condition that (i) one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner (ii) if the petitioner is found involved in future in similar type of case, the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the court below will pass necessary order, including cancellation of bail and (iii) the petitioner would cooperate the proceeding of the court below. In event of failure to appear on two consecutive dates, the court below will be at liberty to pass the order, including cancellation of bail bonds.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T