Kisan Kumar @ Krishna v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33349 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2025 Thana- RUPAULI District- Purnia ====================================================== Kisan Kumar @ Krishna S/o Late Jay Prakash Yadav @ Jay Prakash Singh Resident of Village- Rampur, Parihat, P.S.- Rupauli ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Bhola Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Syed Ehteshamuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c), 21(b) of N.D.P.S. Act.
3. As per the allegations in the F.I.R., 10.95 grams of a brown sugar (smack)-like narcotic substance was recovered from the possession of co-accused Sonu Kumar. During interrogation, he disclosed the name of the petitioner as the person from whom he had purchased the said contraband.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33349 of 2025(2) dt.27-05-2025 2/3
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no connection whatsoever with the contraband allegedly recovered. No incriminating substance has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner; rather, the brown sugar (smack)-like narcotic substance has been recovered from the possession of co-accused Sonu Kumar, and the petitioner's name surfaced solely on the basis of his confessional statement. It is further submitted that upon conclusion of the investigation, the police have submitted charge-sheet, and the learned Court has already taken cognizance of the offence. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 05.03.2025.
5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for Bail.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33349 of 2025(2) dt.27-05-2025 3/3 of the case as well as period of custody, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail, after framing of charge, in connection with Special Case (NDPS) No. 93 of 2025 arising out of Rupauli P.S. Case No. 08 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, N.D.P.S. Act, Purnea, with following condition:- (i) One of the bailors should be close relative or family member of the petitioner.
(S. B. Pd. Singh, J) Nirajkrs/- U T