Patna High CourtC. REV./175/2016dismissed

Md. Qamruzzama v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-05-04Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Review No.175 of 2016 ====================================================== Md. Qamruzzama Kuraisi @ Qamruzama, son of late Md. Taslim Kuraisi, residents of village- Gouri, P.S.- Nanpur, District- Sitamarhi. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Special Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Bihar, Patna.

2. Bihar State Election Authority, Sone Bhawan, 3rd Floor, Birchand Patel Marg, Patna-800001 through the Secretary.

3. Chief Election Officer, Bihar State Election Authority, Sone Bhawan, 3rd Floor, Birchand Patel Marg, Patna-800001.

4. Deputy Secretary, State Election Commission, Bihar, Patna.

5. District Magistrate -cum- District Election Officer (Panchayat), District- Sitamarhi.

6. Block Development Officer -cum- Returning Officer (Panchayat), Nanpur, District- Sitamarhi.

......Respondent 1st Paty/Opp. Party 1st Set.

7. Goura Gram Panchayat, Nanpur, District- Sitamarhi through its Mukhiya.

8. Gouri Gram Panchayat, Nanpur, District- Sitamarhi through its Mukhiya.

......Respondents 2nd Party/Opp. Party 2nd Set.

9. Md. Jamshed Kuraisi, son of late Lallu Kuraisi, R/o Village- Gouri, P.S. -Nanpur, District- Sitamarhi.

.... .... Petitioner/ Opposite Party 3rd Set. ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Yogendra Mishra Mr. Alok Kumar Jha For the Opp. Party/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 04-05-2016 Heard Mr. Yogendra Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the review petitioner and perused the grounds set up for review.

In my opinion the order and judgment under review suffers from no error of record warranting a review rather in view of the liberty so provided under the judgment under review, the ground so raised by the petitioner, stands answered.

Patna High Court C. REV. No.175 of 2016 (2) dt.04-05-2016 The ground so raised by the petitioner requires this Court to sit in appeal over its judgment. The review petitioner not being satisfied by the conclusion reached, is at liberty to question the same before appropriate forum but that cannot be a reason to seek review or for a reconsideration of the judgment. The review application is disposed of accordingly. (Jyoti Saran, J) SKPathak/- U