Akhilesh Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8683 of 2020 ====================================================== Akhilesh Ray Son of Ramji Ray Resident of Village- Saidpur Dumra, Police Station- Patepur, District- Vaishali (Hajipur). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The District Magistrate, Hajipur (Vaishali).

3.

The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Mahua.

4.

Public Grievance Redressal Officer, Mahua.

5.

The then Circle Officer Chandrashekhar Singh, Patepur. 6.

The then S.H.O. (Krishndew Khatait), Patepur. 7.

Naresh Ray, Son of Late Sonelal Ray Resident of Village- Saidpur Dumra, Police Station- Patepur, District- Hajipur (Vaishali). 8.

Musai Ray Son of Jeet Narayan Ray, resident of Village- Saidpur Dumra, Police Station- Patepur, District- Hajipur (Vaishali). 9.

Dharmendra Kumar Son of Musai Ray Resident of Village- Saidpur Dumra, Police Station- Patepur, District- Hajipur (Vaishali). 10.

Raghvendra Ray Son of Musai Ray Resident of Village- Saidpur Dumra, Police Station- Patepur, District- Hajipur (Vaishali). 11.

Nagindra Ray Son of Musai Ray Resident of Village- Saidpur Dumra, Police Station- Patepur, District- Hajipur (Vaishali). 12.

Dev Lal Ray Son of Late Sita Ram Ray Resident of Village- Saidpur Dumra, Police Station- Patepur, District- Hajipur (Vaishali). 13.

Mahesh Ray Son of Late Sita Ram Ray Resident of Village- Saidpur Dumra, Police Station- Patepur, District- Hajipur (Vaishali). ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mirityunjay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH

Patna High Court CWJC No.8683 of 2020(6) dt.30-10-2024 2/3 ORAL ORDER 30-10-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "(I) For directing the Respondents to remove encroachment and comply with the order passed by the Superior Court, within a stipulated period fixed by this Hon'ble Court.

(II) For directing the Respondent No.5 to initiate encroachment proceedings immediately and remove the encroachment from the public road within a stipulated period, to be fixed by this Hon'ble Court.

(III) For restraining the private Respondents from making further construction over the aforesaid public land, appertaining to Khata No.90, Plot No. 1057, Area 2 decimal, situated at Thana No. 460, Mauza- Saidpur Dumra.

IV) For direction to initiate disciplinary proceedings against the Respondents No. 5 and 6."

2.

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a civil suit before the learned civil court of competent jurisdiction, for redressal of his aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

Patna High Court CWJC No.8683 of 2020(6) dt.30-10-2024 3/3 3.

The writ petition stands disposed off.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) kanchan/- U