Patna High CourtCR. MISC./20505/2016rejected

Pappu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2016-06-30Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.20505 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -530 Year- 2015 Thana -BARH District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Pappu Kumar S/o Late Ram Chandra Prasad R/v- Domanachak, P.S.- Gopalpur, Distt- Patna.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md.Aslam Ansari(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 30-06-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Barh P.S. Case No. 530 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 of the Arms Act.

Allegedly, during raid the petitioner was apprehended and from his waist one automatic pistol and twenty cartridges from his pant were recovered. Further from the motorcycle of the petitioner two pistols and 195 live cartridges were recovered. Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner is in custody since 17.12.2015 but up till now, cognizance has not been taken and in near future the trial is not likely to be concluded and as such, he deserves sympathetic

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20505 of 2016 (3) dt.30-06-2016 2/2 consideration as he has got no criminal antecedent. The learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer of bail. In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the alleged recovery, at present I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and accordingly, his such prayer stands rejected in connection with Barh P.S. Case No. 530 of 2015 pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh, Patna.

However, the learned court below is directed to take positive steps so that the trial be concluded preferably within six months from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, failing which the petitioner may be at liberty to renew his prayer of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) SHAHZAD/- U T