Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18445/2016bail granted

Balram Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2016-06-22Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18445 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -337 Year- 2014 Thana -LAKHISARAI District- LAKHISARAI ====================================================== Balram Kumar Son of Late Lakhan Kewat, Resident of village- Jaukmaila, P.S.- Lakhisarai, District- Lakhisarai .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rabi Bhushan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 22-06-2016 Supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner annexing the copy of deposition of witness Raj Kumar who is the informant of this case as P.W. 10 in Sessions Trial No. 151 of 2015.

Let it be kept on record.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer for bail which was earlier rejected by order dated 09.10.2015 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 26402 of 2015 on the ground that the petitioner is in custody since 14.07.2014, the trial has not been concluded within the time given by this Court and the informant has not supported the prosecution version during the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18445 of 2016 (4) dt.22-06-2016 2/2 trial.

The learned APP submits that now the informant has retracted from his earlier version.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, now the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Lakhisarai in connection with Sessions Trial No. 151 of 2015 arising out of Lakhisarai P.S. Case No. 337 of 2014, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) ajaypd./- U T