Vijay Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1562 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18365 of 2018 ====================================================== Vijay Kumar Yadav Son of Late Garbhu Gope, resident of Village- Nari, P.S.- Noor Sarai, District- Nalanda, Principal of Ram Lakhan Singh Yadav, Degree College, Biharsharif, P.S. Biharsharif, District- Nalanda. ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Joint Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Director, Higher Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 5.

The Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya. 6.

The Registrar, Magadh University, Patna.

7.

The Vice Chancellor, Patliputra University, Patna. 8.

The Registrar, Patliputra University, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Md. Anisur Rahman For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey, AAG-15 For Magadh University :

Mr. Arabind Nath Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 29-01-2020 The present appeal is directed against the order dated 12.09.2018 passed by Hon'ble Single Judge in CWJC no. 18365 of 2018 (Vijay Kr. Yadav v. The State of Bihar and ors.). After the matter was heard for sometime, finding the Court not to be in agreement with the submissions made in support of the appeal, for there being neither any illegality nor

Patna High Court L.P.A No.1562 of 2018(2) dt.29-01-2020 2/2 any perversity in the impugned order, the learned counsel for the petitioner expressed apprehension of the delay in completion of the formalities, if the petitioner were to apply afresh, seeking affiliation, in terms of the liberty granted by the learned Single Judge.

We see no reason why there would be any delay in undertaking such process.

In any event learned counsel for the State, states that though the petitioner's apprehension is ill-founded, yet the authorities shall take decision on any application filed by the appellant, promptly/ with reasonable dispatch, and preferably within a period of six months, subject to the petitioner cooperating and completing the formalities, in all respect. Statement accepted and taken on record.

Appeal stands disposed off in the aforesaid terms. (Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/rinkeeU