Raj Kumar Sharma v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No.1586 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18924 of 2015 ====================================================== Raj Kumar Sharma, Son of Late Ram Prasad Sharma, Resident of VillageMansoorchak, P.S.- Mansoorchak, District- Begusarai. ... ... Appellant/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Environment and Forest, Government of Bihar 2.
The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Govt. of Bihar, Sichai Bhawan, Harding Road, Patna-1, 3.
The Forest Conservator, Govt. of Bihar, Forest Extension Anchal, Purnea. 4.
The Divisional Forest Officer-Cum-the Licencing Authority, Govt. of Bihar, Extension Forest Division, Begusarai 5.
The Monitoring Committee-Cum-District Magistrate, Begusarai. 6.
The Conservator of Forest, Govt. of Bihar, Forest Circle, Begusarai. 7.
The Forest Range Officer, Govt. of Bihar, Forest Range Office, Begusarai. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s :
Mr.Chandra Mauli Chaurasia, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 13-01-2020 Ref.: I.A. No. 99 of 2019 This interlocutory application has been filed for condonation of delay of 25 days in filing the present memorandum of appeal.
For the reasons stated in the I.A, delay in filing the present appeal is condoned.
LPA No. 1586 of 2018 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the
Patna High Court L.P.A No.1586 of 2018(3) dt.13-01-2020 2/2 respondents.
The present appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 31.08.2018 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 18924 of 2015 (Raj Kumar Sharma Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors) by which the learned Single Judge has been pleased to dismiss the writ petition of the petitioner-appellant. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal reserving liberty to take recourse to such other remedy as may be available in accordance with law. The appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) uday/- U