Puran Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35294 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-14 Year-2022 Thana- SHAMBHUGANJ District- Banka ====================================================== 1.
Puran Yadav Son Of Late Siyaram Yadav @ Late Shyaram Yadav VillageSotichak Ps- Shambhuganj Dist- Banka 2.
Parikshit Yadav @ Sugadeo @ Sugdeo Yadav Son Of Late Siyaram Yadav @ Late Shyaram Yadav Village- Sotichak Ps- Shambhuganj Dist- Banka 3.
Sukhdeo Yadav @ Sugadeo @ Sugdeo Yadav Son Of Late Siyaram Yadav @ Late Shyaram Yadav Village- Sotichak Ps- Shambhuganj Dist- Banka 4.
Kishore Yadav @ Balkishore Yadav Son Of Late Siyaram Yadav @ Late Shyaram Yadav Village- Sotichak Ps- Shambhuganj Dist- Banka 5.
Mritunjay Yadav Son Of Late Siyaram Yadav @ Late Shyaram Yadav Village- Sotichak Ps- Shambhuganj Dist- Banka ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ajay Mukherjee For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Syed Mojibur Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 27-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and both sides have sustained injury. He submits that the injury found upon the victim is simple in nature. He submits
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35294 of 2023(2) dt.27-07-2023 2/2 that there is no specific overt act against the petitioners. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners. He further submits that petitioners have one criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.
4. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Shambhuganj P.S. Case No. 14 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T