Patna High CourtCR. MISC./14960/2015bail granted

Sohan Jha v. The State Of Bihar

2015-06-02Mr. Justice Amaresh Kumar Lal2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14960 of 2015 (2) dt.02-06-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.14960 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -212 Year- 2014 Thana -KISHUNPUR District- SUPAUL ======================================================

1. Sohan Jha Son of Late Madan Jha resident of village - Baghva, Police Station - Simri Bakhtiarpur, District - Saharsa .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad,APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 02-06-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 395 of the Indian Penal Code and the charge sheet has been submitted under Sections 395/412 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted that the F.I.R. was lodged against unknown regarding the dacoity in a truck. The name of the petitioner has appeared in the confessional statement of the coaccused Mohan Bhagat. No looted article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. No T.I. Parade has been made. In similar facts and circumstances the co-accused Pawan Yadav has been granted bail vide Criminal Miscellaneous No. 14594 of 2015.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14960 of 2015 (2) dt.02-06-2015 Considering the facts and circumstances, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul/court concerned in Kishanpur P. S. Case No. 212 of 2014 with following conditions:-

1. The petitioner will not indulge himself in similar or any other offence.

2. One of the bailors must be the close relative of the petitioner.

3. The petitioner will be well represented in the Court on each and every date and in case of absence for two consecutive dates or in case of violation of terms of bail, his bail bond would be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) Md. Ibrarul/- U T