Pawan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44548 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-283 Year-2011 Thana- Katihar Nagar, District- Katihar ====================================================== 1.

Pawan Yadav S/O Late Kampani Yadav @ Dashrath Yadav R/O MohallaBuddhuchak, P.S- Katihar (Sahayak), District-Katihar. 2.

Laddu Yadav @ Sanjeev Yadav S/O Kishore Yadav @ Ajit Kumar Yadav R/O Mohalla-Buddhuchak, P.S- Katihar (Sahayak), District-Katihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajendra Prasad Sah, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 23-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned APP for the state.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Katihar (Sahayak) P.S. Case No.283 of 2011, registered for the offence under Sections 143, 323, 341, 506, 427, 353, 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation, six accused persons including the petitioners are went to the main gate of Sub-Station and broke away the window pane, two chairs and one bench and also assaulted the staffs who are on duty and fled away with wall clock and telephone set and they got the electricity supply stopped went away by giving threat. The informant assessed the loss to the tune of Rs.65,000/-.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44548 of 2021(2) dt.23-03-2022 2/2 submit that petitioners are innocent and have not committed any offence and have falsely been implicated in this case at the instance of their enemies in the village. He further submits that petitioners were not identified as the members of the assembly and not present at the place of occurrence. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. Petitioners have clean antecedent.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, is directed to be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in connection with Katihar (Sahayak) P.S. Case No. 283 of 2011, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Prakash Narayan /- U T