Smt. Sangeeta Singh @ Sangita Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through The Vigilance Department

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1077 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1735 Year-2009 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== Smt. Sangeeta Singh @ Sangita Singh W/O Late Ranavijay Bahadur Singh Resident of House No. 41, Village- Bhabua, P.S- Bhabua, District- Kaimur, Bhabua- 821101.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Vigilance Department 4th Floor, Suchana Bhawan, Opposite New Secretariat, Patna- 800015. 2.

Additional Chief Secretary, The Vigilance Department, Govt. of Bihar 4th Floor, Suchana Bhawan, Opposite New Secretariat, Patna- 800015. 3.

Superintendent of Police, Vigilance Department 4th Floor, Suchana Bhawan, Opposite New Secretariat, Patna- 800015.

4.

Senior Deputy Superintenden of Police, Vigilance Department 4th Floor, Suchana Bhawan, Opposite New Secretariat, Patna- 800015. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anshul, Sr. Advocate Ms. Akanksha Malviya, Advocate Mr. Akash Keshav, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.A.A.G 3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-06-2025 Heard the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State.

2. This application has been filed for issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari, for quashing the order, dated 03.05.2025, passed by the Court of Special Judge Vigilance 1", Patna, in Special Case No. 02 of 2010, arising out of Vigilance Police Case No. 03 of 2010 whereby the petition, dated 22.04.2025, filed by the petitioner, seeking discharge has been

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1077 of 2025(2) dt.19-06-2025 2/2 rejected summarily.

3. At the very outset, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawing this application to participate in the Trial.

4. Permission is accorded.

5. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn.

6. The Special Judge is directed to conclude the trial at the earliest.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U