← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/22387/2018dismiss for nonprosecution

Ram Shankar Poddar @ Jayram Poddar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2025-07-02Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22387 of 2018 ====================================================== 1.

Ram Shankar Poddar @ Jayram Poddar 2.

Narendra Kumar Poddar @ Naresh Poddar, Both S/o late Bishwanath Poddar. Both R/o Village-Daniyalpur, Station Road, Teghra, Ward No.4, Under Teghra Nagar panchayat, P.O., P.S. and Sub Division-Teghra, DistrictBegusarai-851133. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna. 3.

The District Magistrate, Begusarai.

4.

The Additional District Magistrate, Begusarai. 5.

The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Teghra, Begusarai. 6.

The Circle Officer, Teghra Begusarai.

7.

Ganesh Kumar, S/o late Shiv Shankar Sah, R/o Village-Daniyalpur, Station Road, Teghra, Ward No.4, under Teghra Nagar Panchayat, P.O.,P.S. and Sub Division-Teghra, District-Begusarai-851133.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Subash Chandra Yadav -Gp15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 02-07-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioners, learned counsel appears for respondents-State as well as for respondent no.7 are present.

2. On the previous date i.e. 02.05.2025 also the petitioner had not appeared and by way of last indulgence this matter was adjourned.

3. Today again no one has appeared on behalf of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.22387 of 2018(5) dt.02-07-2025 2/2 petitioners, which makes it clear that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the writ application.

4. Under these circumstances, the writ application is dismissed for non-prosecution.

(Alok Kumar Sinha, J) Prakash Narayan U