Ranjeet Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18339 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -343 Year- 2013 Thana -BARACHATTI District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Ranjeet Yadav Son of Ganauri Yadav, Resident of Village - Vishnupura, P.S. - Mohanpur, District - Gaya..... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhirendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 28-06-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Barachatti (Mohanpur) P.S. Case No. 343 of 2013 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Girja Devi, the daughter of the informant, was married to the petitioner 15 years ago, out of the wedlock there are three children and allegedly, the petitioner and other in-laws used to abuse, torture and assault Girja Devi and ultimately she was assaulted and killed by them.

Submission is of false implication and that there was cordial relation between the petitioner and his wife, the petitioner is in custody since 16.12.2015, no external or mechanical ante mortem injury was found on body of the deceased and it

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18339 of 2016 (4) dt.28-06-2016 2/2 falsifies the prosecution version that the deceased was assaulted, other co-accused Babita Devi, Bhagirat Yadav and others have already been allowed bail and as such the petitioner also deserves sympathetic consideration.

Learned A.P.P. submits that the petitioner is the husband.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering that no external or mechanical injury has been found on the person of the deceased, there is no chance of tampering with prosecution evidence and as such the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Learned A.C.J.M, Sherghati, District Gaya, in connection with Barachatti (Mohanpur) P.S. Case No. 343 of 2013, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) siddharth/- U T