← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./33419/2019rejected

Md. Muazzum @ Guddu @ Md. Moazzum v. The State Of Bihar

2021-12-02Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33419 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-732 Year-2015 Thana- NALANDA COMPLAINT CASE District- Nalanda ====================================================== MD. MUAZZUM @ GUDDU @ MD. MOAZZUM S/o Md. Salim Resident of Village- Bahadauni, P.S.- Nawada, Dsitrict- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.

Mosrat Khatoon W/o Md. Muazzum @ Guddu, D/o Md. Gaffar R/o Ben, P.S.- Ben, District- Nalanda ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raj Kishor Prasad For the State :

Mr. Arun Kumar Singh For the Informant :

Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 02-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 732C/2015 registered under Section 498 A of the Indian Penal Code.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner.

Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party no. 2

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33419 of 2019(16) dt.02-12-2021 2/2 opposed the prayer of the petitioner by contending that petitioner is the husband of the opposite party no. 2. Further submission is that after due undertaking given by the petitioner before this Court vide order dated 06.11.2019, the petitioner has not kept his wife with full honour and dignity and again he is alleged to have assaulted and tortured his wife. Hence, this is not a fit case of anticipatory bail.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

(Arvind Srivastava, J) utkarsh/- U T