Kumar Prem Piyush Pathak v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3745 of 2019 ====================================================== Kumar Prem Piyush Pathak S/o Late Dharmnath Pathak Resident of Pathak Niketan, Resident of Village- Nandlal Tola, Chapra, P.s.- Chapra (M), Distt.- Saran at Chapra, Pricipal, Munnilal High School-cum-Inter College, Saidsarai, Block- Garkha, Distt.- Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar and Ors through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, patna 2.
The Director Secondary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3.
The Divisional Commissioner Saran Division, at Chapra 4.
The Joint Director, Secondary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 5.
The Deputy Development Commissioner-cum-Chief Executive Officer Zila Parisad, Saran at Chapra 6.
The Regional Deputy Director of Education Saran Division at Chapra 7.
The district Education Officer Saran at Chapra 8.
The District Programme Officer (Establishment) Saran at Chapra 9.
The District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority Saran at Chapra 10.
Rup Narayan S/o Sri Vidya Prasad Sinha Resident of Mohalla- Husse Chapra, Nayee Basti, Chapra, P.s.- Chapra Town, Distt. Saran at Chapra, Teacher, Munnilal High School-cum-Inter College, Saidsarai, BlockGarkha, Distt.- Saran at Chapra 11.
Shashi Kant Pathak S/o Late Bhrigunath Pathak Vill.- Saidsarai, P.s.- Garkha, Distt.- Saran at Chapra, Teacher, Munnilal High School-cum-Inter College, Saidsarai, Block- Garkha, Distt.- Saran at Chapra ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
None For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Madanjeet Kumar (Gp20) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 22-04-2024 Despite repeated calls, nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner. From the last several occasions, adjournment is being taken on behalf of the petitioner.
Patna High Court CWJC No.3745 of 2019(10) dt.22-04-2024 2/2 2.
Learned counsel for the State is present.
3.
Under the aforesaid facts, it appears that the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing this writ application. It is accordingly, dismissed for default on account of non-prosecution. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U