← Library
Patna High CourtL.P.A/1671/2017dismissed

Brajnandan Kumar Sinha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2023-07-12The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1671 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13426 of 2017 ====================================================== Brajnandan Kumar Sinha Son of Late Sheo Dular Singh, Resident of Khopi, P.O.- Khopi, P.S.- Jandaha, District- Vaishali. ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary 2.

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

3.

The Director, Secondary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Budh Marg, Patna. 4.

Bihar School Examination Board, Patna through its Secretary, Sinha Library Road, Patna.

5.

Nand Kishore Singh, Secretary, Academic Director, Ramakant Rajeshwari Educational and Social Welfare Trust ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Mrigank Mauli, Sr. Advocate Mr. Nityanand, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Prabhat Ranjan Singh, AC to AAG-15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 12-07-2023 The appellant has challenged the constitution of the governing body in the year 2017 claiming that he is a donor of Ramkant Rajeshwari Educational and Social Welfare Trust, Lakhanpur, Khoksa, Vaishali. The writ petition was rejected on the ground of deficiency in pleadings as to the body which had established the college initially and the existing dispute between private persons. In fact, the constitution of the governing body

Patna High Court L.P.A No.1671 of 2017 dt.12-07-2023 2/2 was made on an application filed by Ramkant Rajeshwari Educational and Social Welfare Trust, Lakhanpur, Khoksa, Vaishali. As of now, we are told that the term of the governing body has expired.

In such circumstance, we find no reason to entertain the appeal. We reject the appeal without any interference to the various grounds found to dismiss the appeal even otherwise; which are perfectly in order.

(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ) ( Partha Sarthy, J) Anushka/Sunil AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 18.07.2023 Transmission Date