Jaidev Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

(FROM RESIDENTIAL OFFICE VIA VIDEO APPLICATION) CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34802 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-190 Year-2018 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Patna ====================================================== Jaidev Kumar Son Of Ram Pravesh Sharma Resident Of Village- Pevata, P.S.- Ghoshi, District- Jehanabad.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. XYZ (informant) D/o Arvind Sharma, R/o Khemnichak, Adarsh Colony, Road No. 1, P.S.- Ramkrishna Nagar, District- Patna ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vipin Kumar, Advocate For the Informant :

Mr. Madanjeet Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Ashok Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 02-02-2022 Heard Mr. Vipin Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Madanjeet Kumar, learned counsel for the informant-O.P. No. 2.

The petitioner as well as O.P. No. 2 are present in the Chamber of Mr. Madanjeet Kumar, learned Advocate and apart from the learned Advocates, this Court has interacted with the petitioner and the O.P. No. 2 in presence of learned counsel for the parties in this virtual mode proceeding. They have jointly informed this Court that both the parties have married to each other in a court of law on 27.09.2021 and they are living separately in their own matrimonial home. The informant-O.P. No. 2 has admitted in presence of her Advocate that she has no complaint now.

In the aforesaid view of the matter, the provisional

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34802 of 2020(12) dt.02-02-2022 2/2 bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 30.07.2021 is hereby confirmed. The petitioner shall be allowed to remain on bail on the same bail bond.

At this stage it has been noticed that though the informant has entered appearance in this case on 09.07.2021 but she has not been formally made party in this case. Therefore, to correct the records, let the informant be added as opposite party no. 2 in the title portion.

This application stands disposed of accordingly. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) SUSHMA2/- U T Note: The ordersheet duly signed has been attached with the record. However, in view of the present arrangements, during Pandemic period all concerned shall act on the basis of the copy of the order uploaded on the High Court website under the heading 'Judicial Orders Passed During The Pandemic Period'.