Yogendra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7524 of 2014 ===========================================================
1. Yogendra Prasad son of late Raghu Singh resident of village - Khedu Chhapra, P.O. Sikatia, Police Station - Maharajganj, District - Siwan, retired while working as Agriculture Advisor Anchal - Bhagwanpur Hat, District - Siwan. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Agriculture Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Director, Agriculture, Bihar, Patna.
3. The District Magistrate, Siwan.
4. The District Treasury Officer, Siwan
5. The Regional Manager, State Bank of India, Anta Ghat, Patna.
6. The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Maharajganj Branch, Maharajganj, District - Patna.
7. The Accountant General, Bihar, Beerchand Patel Marg, Patna. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, Adv. For State Bank of India : Mr. Kaushlendra Kumar Sinha, Adv. For Accountant General : Mr. Ramyash Singh, Adv. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 13-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State Bank of India.
2.
The only grievance of the petitioner in the present writ application is to direct the respondents to issue a duplicate Pension Payment Order as he has lost the original Pension Payment Order given to him after his retirement in the year 2010 for which a complaint was made in the Police Station pursuant to which station diary entry was also made by the police.
3.
It is submitted by Mr. K.K.Sinha, learned advocate
Patna High Court CWJC No.7524 of 2014 dt.13-04-2017 2/2 appearing for the State Bank of India that a duly authenticated Xerox copy of the Pension Payment Order of the petitioner has already been given to Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner.
4.
Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner accepted the contention of Mr. K.K.Sinha, learned counsel for the State Bank of India.
5.
In that view of the matter, since the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed, the writ application is disposed of. (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) Pradeep/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.
Uploading Date 17-04-2017 Transmission Date