Pinku Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37735 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2026 Thana- PARAIYA District- Gaya ====================================================== Pinku Paswan Son of Dilip Paswan Resident of village- Jamune PS -Chandauti District -Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Vinod Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Kanhiya Kishor, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 16-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Paraiya P.S. Case No.57 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Section 309(4) of the BNS.
3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that three unknown miscreants with Deepak Rawani entered in the house of the informant being armed with weapon and it is further alleged that on gun point they assaulted the informant and took away Rupees Ten Thousand and jewellery.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that from perusal of the FIR it is clear that only one person Deepak Rawani was named in the FIR. It has further been submitted that Deepak Rawani was
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37735 of 2026(2) dt.16-06-2026 2/2 apprehended and he has given his confessional statement. The name of this petitioner has surfaced in the confessional statement of Deepak Rawani. Save and except the confessional statement of co-accused there is nothing against this petitioner. No recovery has been made from the possession of this petitioner and no TIP has been conducted. It has further been submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 02.03.2026.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State. It has been submitted that petitioner is having criminal antecedent of three cases.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of learned C.J.M., Gaya Ji in connection with Paraiya P.S. Case No.57 of 2026.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) durgesh/- U T