Razzak Miyan @ Abdul Razzak And ORS. v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Deptt. Of Home, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna And ORS.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.420 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-239 Year-2018 Thana- Gopalganj Town District- Gopalganj ======================================================
1. Razzak Miyan @ Abdul Razzak Son of Late Hussain Miyan @ Late Shekh Hussain
2. Saira Khatoon Wife of Razzak Miyan
3. Harun Miyan @ Md. Harun Son of Razzak Miyan
4. Seraj Miyan @ Md. Seraj Son of Razzak Miyan
5. Bullet Miyan @ Neyaz Ahmad Son of Razzak Miyan
6. Shahnaz Khatoon Daughter of Razzak Miyan.
All Resident of Village- Jaypur, Police Station- Kateya, DistrictGopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Deptt. of Home, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
2. The Director General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Superintendent of Police, Gopalganj.
4. The Station House Officer, Gopalganj Town, Police Station, Gopalganj.
5. The Investigating Officer, Gopalganj Town P.S. Case No.239 of 2018 dated 22.5.2018, Gopalganj Town Police Station, District-Gopalganj.
6. Tabassum Naz Daughter of Salahuddin Ahamad, Resident of At Jangalia, Ward No.18, P.S.-Gopalganj Town, District-Gopalganj. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Javed Aslam, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Partha Sarthy, GA-4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-02-2019 The defects, as pointed out by the registry, are ignored.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned
Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.420 of 2019(2) dt.25-02-2019 2/2 counsel State.
In the instant application, the petitioners have prayed for quashing the first information report (for short 'FIR') of Gopalganj Town P.S. Case No. 239 of 2018 dated 22.05.2018 registered inter alia under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code as also Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioners sought leave to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to challenge any order which the court may pass on the report submitted by the police after completion of investigation under Section 173(2) of the Cr.P.C. Leave is granted.
The writ petition is disposed of.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) Md. S/SKSuman.
U T