Janki Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.19957 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -78 Year- 2014 Thana -SONO District- JAMUI ====================================================== Janki Yadav son of Lakhan Yadav, resident of village- Dudhaniya, P.S.- Sono, District- Jamui .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ganesh Pd.Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-05-2016 Heard Sri Pankaj Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ganesh Prasad Singh, learned A.P.P. This is second attempt for grant of bail on behalf of the petitioner. Earlier, by order dated 11.12.2015 his prayer for bail was rejected vide Cr. Misc. No. 52847 of 2015. Of -course there was no need to again entertain the prayer for bail of the petitioner. However, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on an order dated 16.12.2015 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 34321of 2015. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that almost in similar circumstances one of the co-accused has been granted bail by this court. Accordingly, he makes a prayer for extending the privilege of bail to the petitioner also.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19957 of 2016 (2) dt.04-05-2016 2/2 Besides hearing, I have also perused the material available on record. Keeping in view the fact that in similar circumstance other co -accused has been granted bail by this court, let the petitioner Janki Yadav be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned District and Sessions Judge, Jamui in connection with U.A.P. Case No. 17 of 2015 [arising out of Sono (charkapathar) P.S. Case No. 78 of 2014] with condition that one of the bailors must be blood relation of the petitioner and secondly during the trial petitioner shall remain physically present on each and every date. If continuously on two dates petitioner fails to appear before the trial court without prior permission of the trial court his bail bond shall stand automatically cancelled.
(Rakesh Kumar, J) Praful/- U T