Md. Tamanna v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35609 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-208 Year-2022 Thana- SAKRI District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.
Md. Tamanna Son Of Md. Misho @ Shihaul Resident Of Village - Birsayar, P.S. - Madhubani Town (Wrongly Mention P.S. - Sekhari), Distt. - Madhubani 2.
Md. Chunnu Son Of Md. Misho @ Shihaul Resident Of Village - Birsayar, P.S. - Madhubani Town (Wrongly Mention P.S. - Sekhari), Distt. - Madhubani 3.
Md. Khurshid Son Of Md. Misho @ Shihaul Resident Of Village - Birsayar, P.S. - Madhubani Town (Wrongly Mention P.S. - Sekhari), Distt. - Madhubani 4.
Md. Bilal @ Belal Ahmad Son Of Md. Misho @ Shihaul Resident Of Village - Birsayar, P.S. - Madhubani Town (Wrongly Mention P.S. - Sekhari), Distt. - Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav, Adv.
Mr. Ravi Prakash, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 27-07-2023 Vide order dated 14.06.2023, this application with regard to petitioner no. 1 is dismissed as withdrawn.
2. Hence, this application is being heard only with regard to petitioners no. 2, 3 and 4.
3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
4. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
5. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners along
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35609 of 2023(3) dt.27-07-2023 2/2 with other accused persons is are said to have assaulted the informant by means of lathi and danda.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He submits that though the injury was found grievous in nature but there is no specific overt act against the petitioners. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.
7. Learned APP for the State opposes prayer for anticipatory bail.
8. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Sakri P.S. Case No.208 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T