← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19317/2016bail granted

Nikki Thatheri v. The State Of Bihar

2016-05-05Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.19317 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -128 Year- 2014 Thana -DHARHARA District- MUNGER ====================================================== Nikki Thatheri, son of late Ranjeet Thatheri, Resident of VillagePurabsarai, P.S- Kotwali, District - Munger. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Kumar Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anuradha Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 05-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is accused in connection with Dharhara P.S. Case No. 128 of 2014, registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and the name of the petitioner has been surfaced in the confessional statement of coaccused Saurav Kumar having hand in the dacoity of the motorcycle and other belongings of the informant, except the confessional statement there is nothing against the petitioner to show his involvement in the present case. Further submission is that, in fact, petitioner is accused in two other cases, due to that reason the name of the petitioner has also been implicated by the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19317 of 2016 (2) dt.05-05-2016 2/2 Police in the present case. The petitioner is in custody since 20.03.2015.

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Munger in connection with Dharhara P.S. Case No. 128 of 2014. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the parents/close relative of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit showing his relation with the petitioner.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T