Magadh Homoeopathy Medical College And Hospital v. The Union Of India And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22102 of 2018 ====================================================== Mangla Kamla Homeopathic Medical College And Hospital ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The Union Of India and Ors ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 21883 of 2018 ====================================================== Magadh Homoeopathy Medical College And Hospital Son of Late Dr. B.P. Jawahar, Resident of Mohalla-Khandakpur, Police Station-BIharsharif, District-Nalanda.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The Union Of India 2.
The Secretary, Ministry of AYUSH, Ayush Bhavan 'B'-Block, G.P.O. Complex, INA New Delhi-110023.
3.
The Secretary, Central Council of Homoeopathy, Jawahar Lal Nehru Bhartiya Chikitsa Avum Homoeopathy 4.
The State of Bihar through the Principal secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare, Vikash 5.
The Director, Indigenuous Medicine, Health Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 22223 of 2018 ====================================================== Rameshwar Das Kedia Homoeopathy Medical College And Hospital son of Late Ahmad Ansari, resident of Mohalla- Ward No. 13, Mahammadpur, P.S.- Badharia, District- Siwan.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The Union Of India 2.
The Secretary, Ministry of Ayurveda, Yoga and Naturopathy, Unani Shddha and Homoeopathy, Ayush Bhaw 3.
The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare, Vikas null null 4.
The Director, Desi Chikitsa, Health Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 5.
The Secretary, Central Council of Homoeopathy, 61-65, Institutional Area,
Patna High Court CWJC No.22102 of 2018(9) dt.17-03-2023 2/3 Opp. 'D' Block, Janakpuri ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 22743 of 2018 ====================================================== The Temple Of Hahnemann Homoeopathic Medical College and Hospital null null ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The Union Of India 2.
The Secretary, Ministry of Ayurveda, Yoga and Naturopathy, Unani Shddha and Homoeopathy, Ayush Bhaw 3.
The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Department Health and FW, Department of Health, 4.
The Director, Desi Chikitsa, Health Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 5.
The Secretary, Central Council of Homoeopathy, 61-65, Institutional Area, Opp. 'D' Block, Janakpuri ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
(In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 22102 of 2018) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Kumar Kishan Mr. Avinash Roushan For the State :
Mr. Niraj Kumar, AC to GA 10 For Union of India :
Ms. Punam Kumari Singh, CGC (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 21883 of 2018) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Gyan Prakash For the Respondent/s :
Mr. S. D. Yadav, AAG 9 Mr. Nagendra Kumar, AC to AAG 9 (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 22223 of 2018) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Kumar Kishan Mr. Avinash Roushan For the State :
Mr.Mujtabul Haque -Gp12 Mr. Vasant Vikash, AC tp GP 12 (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 22743 of 2018) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Kumar Kishan Mr. Avinash Roushan For the State :
Mr. Ravi Kumar, AC to GP 13 For Union of India :
Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Pandey, Sr.CGC Mr. Ravindra Kumar Sharma, CGC Mr. Arvind Kumar Tewary, CGC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-03-2023 Heard learned Counsel for the parties concerned.
Patna High Court CWJC No.22102 of 2018(9) dt.17-03-2023 3/3 Since the academic sessions has, now, expired, all these writ applications have become infructuous. Though, learned Counsel for the petitioners insisted that the academic question, i.e., the power of the AYUSH should be decided, I am not inclined to decide the academic question when no relief can be granted to the petitioners. These writ applications are, accordingly, dismissed. (Anil Kumar Sinha, J.) Prabhakar Anand/- U √