Patna High CourtC. REV./236/2017dismissed

Nitu Kumari And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-06-20The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Review No.236 of 2017 In Letters Patent Appeal No.456 of 2017 ======================================================

1. Nitu Kumari, daughter of Sri Shiv Kumar Singh, resident of Village- Maheba, P.O.- Chariyari, P.S.- Makhdumpur, DistrictJehanabad.

2. Shashi Bhushan Kumar, son of Sri Ram Sevak Singh, resident of Village- Kakhaura, P.O.- Pandaul, P.S.- Sakurabad, DistrictJehanabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Collectror, Jehanabad.

3. The District Development Commissioner, Jehanabad.

4. The District Superintendent of Education, Jehanabad.

5. The Block Development Officer, Makhdumpur, P.S.- Makhdumpur, DistrictJehanabad.

6. The Block Education Extension Officer, Block Office- Makhdumpur, DistrictJehanabad.

7. The Mukhiya, Sumera Gram Panchayat, Sumera, P.S.- Makhdumpur, P.O.- Birra, District- Jehanabad.

8. The Panchayat Secretary, Sumera Gram Panchayat, P.O.- Birra, P.S.- Makhdumpur, District- Jehanabad.

9. The District Teacher Employment Appellate Tribunal, Jehanabad.

10. Sabita Kumari, wife of Dhananjay Kumar Mridul, Resident of VillageGhanshyam Bigha, P.O.- Birra, P.S.- Makhdumpur, District- Jehanabad. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raj Ballabh Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey (Aag 15) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 20-06-2018 None is present on behalf of the petitioners. Perused the record.

This application has been filed for review/recall of the order dated 19.04.2017 passed in LPA No. 456 of 2017. The

Patna High Court C. REV. No.236 of 2017(4) dt.20-06-2018 2/2 grievance raised for review does not meet the requirement of law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sasi vs. Aravindakshan Nair [(2017) 4 SCC 692].

Accordingly, this application is dismissed as there is no error apparent on the face of the record.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) ( Sudhir Singh, J) mrl./- U