Jaichand Sharma v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.26493 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -94 Year- 2013 Thana -BHELDI District- SARAN ======================================================
1. Jaichand Sharma s/o Indra Deo Sharma r/o Village - Rampur p/s Garkha District Saran .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Santosh Kumar Verma S/o Ram Layak Sharma r/o village Malahi, p.s. Bheldi, District Saran.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anant Kumar Bhaskar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ramesh Chandra(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-07-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under sections 406, 420, 366, 302/34, 120(B), 201 and 211 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged in the F.I.R.
that the accused persons being father and other family members of the wife of the informant used to demand money from his wife and lastly in absence of the informant they took away his wife on the pretext of illness of her mother and when the informant came to his house, he went to his sasural and inquired about his wife but could not find any trace of his wife. The accused persons have taken away cash and ornaments with his wife. The informant learnt that the accused persons have committed murder of his wife and they have also committed the murder of the sister of his wife when the demand of money was not fulfilled by her Sasural.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26493 of 2015 (2) dt.27-07-2015 On behalf of the petitioner it is submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 22.04.2015. Charge-sheet has been submitted in the case. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It has been submitted that the petitioner is none but the father of the deceased and the informant is the son-in-law of the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner had instituted a case for the offence under section 304-B of the Indian Penal Code against the informant of the present case which was instituted prior to the institution of the present case against the petitioner. The informant just for the purpose of creating his defence has got the present case instituted against the parents and other family members of the deceased.
On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.
Considering the facts aforesaid, let the petitioner above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Vivek Rai, Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Bheldi P.S. Case no. 94 of 2013.
(Sudhir Singh, J) Amin/- U