Patna High CourtCR. MISC./33814/2025bail rejected

Sharwan Nishan @ Sarwar @ Sarvan v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-20Mr. Justice Jitendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33814 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-117 Year-2024 Thana- ABADPUR District- Katihar ====================================================== Sharwan Nishan @ Sarwar @ Sarvan W/O Mustafa Resident of VillageGuwal Toli, P.S- Abadpur, District- Katihar ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Md Musowir, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Akbar Ali, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, apprehending his arrest, in connection with Abadpur P.S. Case No.117 Year-2024, dated -20.11.2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 85, 108 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. As per allegation, the deceased was subjected to torture by the petitioner and co-accused on account of nonfulfillment of the demand of dowry, resulting into commission of suicide by the deceased.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the Petitioner is the mother-in-law and she has no role in the commission of the suicide by the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33814 of 2025(3) dt.20-08-2025 2/2 deceased.

5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.

6. It has further been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents.

7. However, learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the Petitioner for bail submitting that the allegation against the Petitioner and other co-accused persons is serious in nature and there is sufficient material on record in support of the prosecution case.

8. Considering the nature of allegation and material on record, I am not persuaded to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioner.

9. Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail petition of the Petitioner is rejected.

(Jitendra Kumar, J.) Chandan Ajay/- U T