Vidyanand Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9280 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-560 Year-2014 Thana- LAKHISARAI District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== VIDYANAND THAKUR Son of Sipahi Thakur Resident of Village - Patel Nagar, Naya Bazar, P.S.- Lakhisarai, District - Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dharmendra Kumar Raju, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 04-01-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is expected to honour his undertaking given in the instant case for depositing the requisite court fee and to remove the defect(s) as pointed out by the office when called upon to do so by the office. The petitioner is apprehended his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 409 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner has already intimated to the concerned authority by his letter in the year 2017 to adjust the dues amount, if any from his CPF/retiral benefits amount. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner by way of supplementary affidavit that he has deposited on 04.02.2021 the advance amount of Rs.4,20,981/- vide cheque no.734971 in the Office of Executive Engineer CADA

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9280 of 2021(2) dt.04-01-2022 2/2 Lakhisarai, thereafter a letter was issued vide Letter No.22/KAD Lakhisarai dated 20.02.2021 stating therein that after deposit of alleged amount no dues against the petitioner in respect with boundary of Kabristan which is Annexure-4 to the petition. It is further submitted that co-accused, who is named in the FIR, has already been granted anticipatory bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court passed in Cr. Misc. No. 28315 of 2015 vide order dated 22.06.2015.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in connection with Lakhisarai (Kabaiya) P.S. Case No. 560 of 2014 (G.R. No. 1457 of 2014), subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) brajesh kumar/- U T