Uday Kumar @ Uday Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35887 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2020 Thana- LADAIYATAR District- Munger ====================================================== Uday Kumar @ Uday Yadav S/o Sudhir Yadav Residents of Satgharwa, PSLaraiyatand, District- Munger ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate Mr. Md. Fazle Karim, Advocate Mr. Kumar Rajdeep, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Pushpa Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 20-06-2025 Heard Mr. N.K. Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Pushpa Sinha, learned APP for the State. 2.The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Laraiyatand P.S. Case No. 01 of 2020 instituted for the offence under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26(ii) and 35 of the Arms Act and Sections 10, 11, 13, 18 and 20 of the UAPA Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that from the possession of this petitioner, one double barrel gun, one country-made rifle, 56 live cartridges and other articles were recovered.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. He also submits that from perusal of the place of occurrence, which has been described by the I.O. in para-3 of the case diary that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35887 of 2025(2) dt.20-06-2025 2/2 room from which the recovery has been made had a door and a broken window. He also submits that the place from where the recovery is made is an abundant place, and he is not concerned in any way with the seizure. It has also been submitted that the petitioner is a government official and he is having no criminal antecedent.

5. In contra, learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of bail of the petitioner.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Laraiyatand P.S. Case No. 01 of 2020, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate- 1st Class, Munger subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T