Patna High CourtL.P.A/1042/2014dismissed

Ramayan Rai And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-11-02Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad,Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1042 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6968 of 1991 ======================================================

1. Ramayan Rai Son of Amla Rai

2. Bishwanath Son of Manager Rai

3. Rajendra Rai Son of Nepal Rai Resident of Village - Semariya, Police Station Kateya, District Gopalganj ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Department of Land Reforms & Revenue, Govt. of Bihar

2. The Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Gopalganj

3. The Collector, Gopalganj

4. The Additional Member Board of Revenue, Bihar, Patna

5. Subhawati Devi @ Sudama Devi Wife of Late Ranglal Rai

6. Santosh Rai Son of Late Ranglal Rai

7. Nirmala Devi

8. Saroj Devi

9. Rita Devi

10. Anita Devi

11. Sunita Devi Sl. 7 to 11 all daughter of late Ranglal Rai nos. 5 to 11 Resident of Village - Semariya, Police Station Kateya, District Gopalganj

12. Chandrama Rai Son of Madan Rai Resident of Village - Semariya, Police Station Kateya, District Gopalganj

13. Dhirendra Pratap Shahi

14. Jitendra Pratap Shahi Both Sons of late Birendra Pratap Shahi

15. Anjana Shahi Daughter of late Birendra Pratap Shahi Residents of Village - Hathua, P.S. Mirganj, District - Gopalganj ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Nagendra Rai For the Respondent/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) 02-11-2017 Perused the petition for condonation, which is I.A. No.5354 of 2015. There is extraordinary delay of three years and 43 days, for which no satisfactory explanation has been

Patna High Court LPA No.1042 of 2014(4) dt.02-11-2017 2/2 given.

Even otherwise, the Court is informed that in terms of the Single Judge's order, a suit has also been filed. Be that as it may, the condonation application is dismissed. As a consequence, even the appeal is dismissed. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) ( Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) sk U