Ram Ayodhya Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.27122 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -16 Year- 2014 Thana -PAHARPUR DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Ram Ayodhya Prasad son of Baldeo Prasad Resident of Village Ibrahimpur, Police Station - Paharpur, District - East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dasrath Mehta (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-07-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is in custody in Paharpur P.S.Case No. 16 of 2014 ( S.Tr. No. 63 of 2015) registered under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 / 4 of D.P.Act, pending in the Court of learned Additional District and Sessions Jude-10, East Champaran at Motihari.

The sister of the informant, namely, Meera Devi, was married with the petitioner. She complained that her in-laws are demanding Rs. 50,000/- dues amount of dowry and they used to assault her. The informant came to know through the father-inlaw of the sister of the informant that his sister is not available in the house. On that information, the informant and Ram nath

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27122 of 2015 (2) dt.28-07-2015 2/2 Prasad went at the house of his sister and they did not found any family members at the house and the house was closed. After search the dead body of his sister was found in the bank of Canal then the informant informed to the police.

On behalf of the petitioner, it has been submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 12.7.2014. It is further submitted that though the petitioner is the husband of the deceased but during trial three witnesses have been examined and none has supported the prosecution case.

On behalf of the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is the husband of the deceased and there is direct allegation against him.

Considering the facts aforesaid, the trial court is directed to expedite the trial and if necessary on day to day basis and conclude the same within a period of four months. The bail application of the petitioner is rejected.

(Sudhir Singh, J) singh/- U T