Jeera Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.22587 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -62 Year- 2015 Thana -RAJPUR DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Jeera Ram S/o Late Raghunath Ram resident of Vill.- Bhurkurwa, P.SRajepur Dist.- East Champaran.. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sangeet Deokuliar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 25-05-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offences punishable under sections 447, 427, 147, 148, 149, 341, 324, 325, 307, 379 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. with allegation that he assaulted with farsa on the head of the informant causing serious injury and further assaulted the mother of the informant on her head causing injury and another co-accused assaulted others. Submission is of false implication, the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent, the informant and his mother both have received simple injury and this case, other co-accused have been allowed pre-arrest bail vide Cr. Misc. No.21172 of 2016,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22587 of 2016 (2) dt.25-05-2016 2/2 good sense has prevailed between the parties and compromise petition has also been filed in the learned court below duly signed by the informant and other injured and, as such, the petitioner, who is suffering in custody since 24.11.2015, now deserves sympathetic consideration to which the learned A.P.P. fairly submits after going through Annexure-2 series that the injuries caused are simple in nature, but the injuries are on the vital part of the informant and his mother.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner, above named, is also directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Sadar at Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Rajepur P.S. Case No.62 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) N.H./- U T